1 |
Actually, now that you mention it, I don't think the vanilla sources for |
2 |
2.4.25 have uac_sysctl. That would be useful. The rest, I don't know. |
3 |
Didn't notice. And I'm not familiar with some of them. |
4 |
|
5 |
As far as new hardware goes, stand in line, buddy! :-) |
6 |
|
7 |
Jeff D |
8 |
|
9 |
-----Original Message----- |
10 |
From: Marc Giger [mailto:gigerstyle@×××.ch] |
11 |
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 3:35 PM |
12 |
To: gentoo-alpha@g.o; Donsbach, Jeff |
13 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:03:43 -0500 |
17 |
"Donsbach, Jeff" <jeff.donsbach@××.com> wrote: |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> Marc, |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Help a newbie. ;-) What would be the difference between your 2.4.25 |
23 |
|
24 |
Hehe:-) Ok, I will help you if you help me. I saw your e-mail address |
25 |
and it seems you are working at hp. The source for alpha's! I need more |
26 |
alphas!:-)) EV67 or newer would be cool. So you send me a board and a |
27 |
processor (or even better dual) and I will answer your question*BIG |
28 |
SMILE |
29 |
|
30 |
> ebuild and the current vanilla sources? I've been running a "vanilla |
31 |
> source" kernel for a few days and it seems fine to me (in my limited |
32 |
> use so far). |
33 |
|
34 |
No kidding! If you are happy with vanilla-source I think you won't |
35 |
profit from alpha-sources. But it will contain almost the same thing as |
36 |
alpha-sources 2.4.21: |
37 |
|
38 |
- xfs (useless with 2.4.25) |
39 |
- grsecurity |
40 |
- usagi |
41 |
- cryptoloop-jari |
42 |
- superfreeswan |
43 |
- uac_sysctl |
44 |
- forgot something? |
45 |
|
46 |
Where usagi and superfreeswan are exclusive |
47 |
|
48 |
Additionally I will add acl's (ea+acl+nfsacl) to the tree, because I |
49 |
think it's also a very useful security feature. |
50 |
|
51 |
greets |
52 |
|
53 |
Marc loves his alpha Giger |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list |