Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alpha

From: Davide Cittaro <davide.cittaro@×××××××××××××××.it>
To: gentoo-alpha@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alpha] gcc 4.1.1-r3?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:58:30
Message-Id: 47BBA11C-6FF3-4A2E-A037-287C42C3813A@ifom-ieo-campus.it
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alpha] gcc 4.1.1-r3? by "José Luis Rivero (yoswink)"
1 Hi
2
3 On May 14, 2007, at 11:42 AM, José Luis Rivero (yoswink) wrote:
4
5 > Hello Davide:
6 >
7 > Davide Cittaro escribió:
8 >> Hi all, I'm trying to upgrade to alpha profile for gentoo 2007.
9 >> Since gcc 4.1.1 has been considered stable, it is included in my
10 >> system emerge process. BTW I cannot compile it. Before posting the
11 >> bug report on bugs.gentoo.org, I would like to know if somebody
12 >> here has gcc 4.1.1 working on gentoo alpha
13 >
14 > In Gentoo/Alpha gcc is usually well tested before it goes to stable
15 > (due to the nature of our distribution). So yes, some of us have
16 > gcc 4.1.1 working on alpha.
17 >
18 > Anyway, it's quite difficult to check every combination present in
19 > each system, so probably something in your system is triggering the
20 > error. Best thing to do is file a bug and attach there your emerge
21 > --info and the error.
22 >
23
24 done. it's bug 178482
25
26 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178482
27
28 in the meantime, do you have any hint? It is a DS25 (ev68 processor).
29 I've tried to change -march flag from ev67 to ev6, I've tried to
30 remove -j3 make option... no way!
31 I'm in the middle of a general upgrading, so it would be great to
32 have a system working in a few time. Do you think I can go on in
33 emerging system? I still miss these packages:
34
35 # emerge -Dup system
36
37 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
38
39 Calculating system dependencies... done!
40 [ebuild NS ] sys-devel/gcc-4.1.1-r3 USE="fortran nls (-altivec) -
41 bootstrap -build -doc -gcj -gtk (-hardened) -ip28 -ip32r10k -mudflap
42 (-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) -nocxx -objc -objc++ -objc-gc -
43 test -vanilla"
44 [ebuild U ] sys-fs/e2fsprogs-1.39 [1.38-r1]
45 [ebuild N ] sys-apps/acl-2.2.39-r1 USE="nls -nfs"
46 [ebuild U ] sys-libs/glibc-2.5-r2 [2.3.5-r3] USE="nptl* nptlonly*
47 -debug%"
48 [ebuild U ] net-misc/rsync-2.6.9-r1 [2.6.8-r2] USE="acl*"
49 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/util-linux-2.12r-r5 [2.12r-r3]
50 [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r2 [3.4.6-r1] USE="-d% -gtk* -test%"
51 [ebuild U ] sys-fs/udev-104-r12 [070-r1]
52 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/module-init-tools-3.2.2-r3 [3.2.1] USE="-no-
53 old-linux%"
54 [ebuild U ] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r5 [0.78-r3]
55 [ebuild U ] sys-apps/shadow-4.0.18.1 [4.0.15-r2] USE="cracklib%*"
56 [ebuild U ] net-misc/openssh-4.5_p1-r1 [4.3_p2-r5]
57
58 and a 2.6 kernel (of course). I was afraid that new kernel wouldn't
59 work, but I have a bigger problem if neither gcc compiles... :-(
60
61 d
62
63 /*
64 Davide Cittaro
65 HPC and Bioinformatics Systems @ Informatics Core
66
67 IFOM - Istituto FIRC di Oncologia Molecolare
68 via adamello, 16
69 20139 Milano
70 Italy
71
72 tel.: +39(02)574303007
73 e-mail: davide.cittaro@×××××××××××××××.it
74 */