Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alpha
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alpha: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alpha@g.o
From: Marc Giger <gigerstyle@...>
Subject: Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:13:48 +0100
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:36:24 -0500
Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> wrote:

> Marc Giger wrote:	[Wed Feb 25 2004, 02:07:18PM EST]
> > A lot! Some month ago I made a new ebuild for 2.4.23 (search
> > archive), but it was never picked up and integrated to portage:-(
> 
> My fault :-(
> 
> > I'm willing to do the same for 2.4.25 but I'm still waiting for some
> > updated patches (e.g acl, superfreeswan, USAGI etc).
> 
> Coolness, maybe this time I'll get it in! :-)

maybe? ;-))

--
gentoo-alpha@g.o mailing list

Replies:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Aron Griffis
References:
vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- jwsacksteder
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Jay Maynard
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Marc Giger
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Aron Griffis
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alpha: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Next by thread:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Previous by date:
RE: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Next by date:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alpha mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.