Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-alpha
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alpha: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alpha@g.o
From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>
Subject: Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:36:24 -0500
Marc Giger wrote:	[Wed Feb 25 2004, 02:07:18PM EST]
> A lot! Some month ago I made a new ebuild for 2.4.23 (search archive),
> but it was never picked up and integrated to portage:-(

My fault :-(

> I'm willing to do the same for 2.4.25 but I'm still waiting for some
> updated patches (e.g acl, superfreeswan, USAGI etc).

Coolness, maybe this time I'll get it in! :-)

Regards,
Aron

--
Aron Griffis
Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim)
Key fingerprint = E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76  FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0

Attachment:
pgpy7UBUHOiJ1.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Marc Giger
References:
vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- jwsacksteder
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Jay Maynard
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
-- Marc Giger
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alpha: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Next by thread:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Previous by date:
Re: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources
Next by date:
RE: vanilla-sources vs alpha-sources


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-alpha mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.