1 |
Mathieu MILLET wrote: [Sun Apr 18 2004, 04:51:44AM EDT] |
2 |
> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -mcpu=ev56 -O3 -pipe -Wall -o |
3 |
> libstartup-notification-1.la -rpath /usr/lib -no-undefined sn-common.lo |
4 |
> sn-internals.lo sn-launchee.lo sn-launcher.lo sn-list.lo sn-monitor.lo |
5 |
> sn-util.lo sn-xmessages.lo sn-xutils.lo -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lSM -lICE |
6 |
> -lX11 |
7 |
> gcc -shared .libs/sn-common.o .libs/sn-internals.o .libs/sn-launchee.o |
8 |
> .libs/sn-launcher.o .libs/sn-list.o .libs/sn-monitor.o .libs/sn-util.o |
9 |
> .libs/sn-xmessages.o .libs/sn-xutils.o -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lSM -lICE |
10 |
> -lX11 -mcpu=ev56 -Wl,-soname -Wl,libstartup-notification-1.so.0 -o |
11 |
> .libs/libstartup-notification-1.so.0.0.0 |
12 |
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so: file not recognized: File format not recognized |
13 |
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status |
14 |
|
15 |
Could you put this in a bug report? I just tried and didn't hit this |
16 |
problem. |
17 |
|
18 |
> If I understand well, there is something wrong with the lib libSM.so |
19 |
> provided during Xfree compilation. |
20 |
|
21 |
It sounds that way, but the question is why? |
22 |
|
23 |
Mathieu MILLET wrote: [Sun Apr 18 2004, 08:20:40AM EDT] |
24 |
> I have removed and symlink to libSM.so.6.0 and it ..... still fails but |
25 |
> with a new error : |
26 |
|
27 |
Don't do that. :-) The shared object is build with -fPIC in |
28 |
anticipation that other shared objects might link against it. The |
29 |
static archive is built without -fPIC. You need the shared object. |
30 |
|
31 |
Regards, |
32 |
Aron |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Aron Griffis |
36 |
Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / mozilla / mutt / ruby / vim) |