List Archive: gentoo-alpha
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Mon, 6 Oct 2003 08:07:29 +0200
Mathieu MILLET <htam@...> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:05:18AM -0400,
> jwsacksteder@... wrote:
> > After 3 hours of chewing on the bootstrap script, glibc produced
> > the following message. If you have successfully built
> > glibc-2.3.2-r1, please let me know.
> glibc-2.3.2-r1 is broken on alpha. You need a patch that has already
> been integrated in glibc-2.3.2-r6 (well maybe before, but I'm sure for
> this one).
> BUT 2.3.2-r6 has another problem and yet can't be compiled
> too (I have already submitted the bug for 2.3.2-r6, cf. bug#30302).
Yeah, I tried to build a cross-compiler for alpha on intel and came to
the same error. I thought it was a error which happens only when I build
a crosscompiler, it seems it isn't the case...
I asked myself (and now you) if it would be good if we place a new
ebuild in the portage tree WITH the latest CVS version of glibc. It has
a lot of fixes for alphas!?!
email@example.com mailing list