Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Moritz Schlarb <mail@××××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-alt] Re: emerge gcc 4.4.x/4.5.x fails on CentOS 5.5
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:55:18
Message-Id: j5kn8h$q2c$1@dough.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: emerge gcc 4.4.x/4.5.x fails on CentOS 5.5 by Fabian Groffen
Okay, but - just for my understanding -  why isn't it possible to have
glibc in prefix ?

Am 24.09.2011 15:02, schrieb Fabian Groffen:
> On 24-09-2011 08:58:00 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote: >>>> If my time allows it, I'll look into it in five minutes, this is just a >>>> message to everyone having this issue that there may be a light on the >>>> horizon! ;) >>> >>> try USE=vanilla, see if that works >> >> Be careful with that. I was able to install gcc 4.5 using -vanilla bit >> then later on random packages would fail to compile. In particular I >> had a problem with libxml2, which seemed to get linked to system >> libraries instead of the ones in prefix. I'm not sure if this is >> related, all I know is that the problem goes away when using gcc 4.2. > > You're absolutely right. It was meant as try to see if one of the > patches affected the build. The produced GCC is unusable in Prefix > indeed. > >> Also, have a look at the gcc ebuild the regular portage tree, gcc >> 4.5.2 requires >=glibc.2.8, I assume there is a reason for that. > >
-- Moritz Schlarb

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-alt] Re: emerge gcc 4.4.x/4.5.x fails on CentOS 5.5 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>