1 |
Hello Han, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:31:02PM +0000, Han H. wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> Yes /usr/include is there. I am not able to install mac packages so an update must not be run by me. |
6 |
|
7 |
> $ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx |
8 |
> xcode-select: error: tool 'xcodebuild' requires Xcode, but active developer directory '/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools' is a command line tools instance |
9 |
|
10 |
I think thats your problem right there. Think about this sequence of |
11 |
commands: |
12 |
|
13 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path |
14 |
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk |
15 |
osx:~ amichael$ sudo xcode-select -s /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools |
16 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path |
17 |
xcode-select: error: tool 'xcodebuild' requires Xcode, but active developer directory '/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools' is a command line tools instance |
18 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path 2>/dev/null |
19 |
osx:~ amichael$ echo $? |
20 |
1 |
21 |
osx:~ amichael$ sudo xcode-select -s /Applications/Xcode.app |
22 |
osx:~ amichael$ xcodebuild -version -sdk macosx Path 2>/dev/null |
23 |
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.11.sdk |
24 |
|
25 |
So just have someone with sudo/root access on the box fix up the Xcode |
26 |
installation using a command like: |
27 |
|
28 |
sudo xcode-select -s /Applications/Xcode.app |
29 |
|
30 |
... and you should be all set. |
31 |
|
32 |
> I saw in the check |
33 |
|
34 |
> -- Finding valid architectures for osx... |
35 |
> -- OSX supported arches: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
36 |
> -- Finding valid architectures for 10.4... |
37 |
> -- OSX 10.4 supported arches: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
38 |
> -- Compiler-RT supported architectures: i386;x86_64;x86_64h |
39 |
|
40 |
> does that mean it detects my system is 10.4? |
41 |
|
42 |
No, they've got workarounds for functions that hadn't been invented yet |
43 |
on 10.4. I guess they're detecting what platforms they need to compile |
44 |
those for. I think you can ignore that. |
45 |
|
46 |
> I also tried 3.8.1-r2 but same thing happens. llvm-3.9.0_rc3 requires |
47 |
> more upgrade (cmake...) and not sure if uncomplete upgrade (if cmake |
48 |
> updates and llvm remains 3.7.1) will cause a broken toolchain. |
49 |
|
50 |
My compile of 3.8.1 went fine, BTW. |
51 |
|
52 |
BTW: I'll be out on holiday starting now. So sorry if you have followup |
53 |
questions and I don't respond for a while. |
54 |
-- |
55 |
bye, Michael |
56 |
weiser.dinsnail.net/ |