Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-alt] Re: RFC: changing sys-apps/portage python API to use $EROOT instead of $ROOT for keys to portage.db and similar map objects
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:22:55
Message-Id: 20111209192243.GD780@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Re: RFC: changing sys-apps/portage python API to use $EROOT instead of $ROOT for keys to portage.db and similar map objects by Zac Medico
On 09-12-2011 11:18:33 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Here's the commit to watch out for if/when it gets merged into the > > prefix branch: > > > > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=a715b65f7bd36409c1283e6911265d1f4405ab7a > > This change has hit in prefix portage-2.2.01.19833. The only problem > that I've noticed so far is that `eselect news` doesn't find news items. > I've attached a patch for eselect in order to fix this. The following > commit will also have to be applied to prefix portage-2.2.01.19833 in > order to make this work correctly: > > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=174ffd8336ec9914f85f871b7ce78506574d3d9b
Thanks! Is there a bug against eselect for this? Prefix has no local copy of eselect. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies