| 1 |
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 00:30 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
[snip] |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Before anyone says "but, that will be much more likely to break my |
| 7 |
> prefix" - I refute that because we are already running on this policy |
| 8 |
> with regards to the automatic bumps. For the most part, it is smooth. |
| 9 |
> Major packages are masked if someone hasn't tested them yet (eg. gcc & bash) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Any other thoughts? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
so you suggest for all different profiles to just use for example x86 |
| 14 |
instead of x86-interix? i don't know... this sounds like breaking all |
| 15 |
"if x86-interix" things, which would definitely be uncool - and there |
| 16 |
are some of those if's for interix and winnt, that would definitely |
| 17 |
disturb others. now i could of course fall back to `uname`, but that |
| 18 |
would be like a journey to stone-age... |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
please correct me if i understood this wrong. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
however i talked to haubi a while back about keywords. he for sure has |
| 23 |
some more wise words to say :) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Cheers, Markus |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> -Jeremy |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> [1]: I do weekly emerge -e world but that clearly will not test all |
| 31 |
> packages on all arches. Just the @system+$random set on one arch. |
| 32 |
> |
Archives