1 |
Hi yegle, |
2 |
|
3 |
as nice as your github advertisement sounds, for the prefix-overlay it |
4 |
is just not right thing. |
5 |
|
6 |
Currently we are working on getting rid of packages from the overlay |
7 |
(and get them back into the official gentoo tree, |
8 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=315803). And we are pretty |
9 |
close - this morning there were only 162 packages left in the overlay |
10 |
($find prefix.svn -name metadata.xml | wc -l). Nothing against user |
11 |
contributions, but as the prefix overlay will go away, contributing |
12 |
your changes to the gentoo tree directly (via bugs.gentoo.org) make |
13 |
more sense. |
14 |
|
15 |
Also if your changes are science-related get them included into the |
16 |
sci overlay, which is on github already and supports prefix as well. |
17 |
|
18 |
Cheers, |
19 |
|
20 |
Christoph |
21 |
|
22 |
2013/1/21 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>: |
23 |
> On 21-01-2013 18:36:41 +0900, heroxbd wrote: |
24 |
>> A causion: Gentoo Prefix SVN repo will fade away finally and integrated |
25 |
>> back into gentoo-x86, according to Fabian(ping). |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Yes, so a bit pointless to do it on the Prefix repo. It's a Gentoo |
28 |
> "problem", really. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> |
31 |
> -- |
32 |
> Fabian Groffen |
33 |
> Gentoo on a different level |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
Christoph Junghans |
39 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/ |