Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:52:55
Message-Id: 20110831185230.GP42206@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? by Burcin Erocal
On 31-08-2011 15:09:45 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > Aha. That explains. Now I understand why the fix fixes it as well. > > I'll apply it ASAP. Thanks a lot! > > A better fix might be to replace the + at the end of line 163 with \. > This way the parser concatenates the strings and we don't introduce an > extra operation. :)
Since I'm a Python n00b, please tell me if http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commitdiff;h=5551d449dffe531935dcd672f37c5cd3abd55a44;hp=3b74444f6684d7696e549cbdb76b8d1a0795fe2d is supposedly what you meant it to be. Thanks! -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org>