1 |
Hi Fabian, |
2 |
|
3 |
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:03:11PM +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
|
5 |
> upgraded it to anything newer. We didn't use csu for a long time, until |
6 |
> I understood why Kito had added the package. I remember updating CSU a |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm feeling a bit sense here: The system compiler and linker were able |
9 |
to produce a first gcc-apple-4.2.1. Now that one isn't able to compile |
10 |
itself. I copied over crt1.o from the system for a try and that didn't |
11 |
change anything either. There's something really fishy going on there. |
12 |
I'll try to investigate. |
13 |
|
14 |
> couple of times, so the latest version very well may not be compatible |
15 |
> with PPC/10.4. We could/should mask it. |
16 |
|
17 |
There's only csu-79 in the tree. I'll try to do a bit of downgrading on |
18 |
that. |
19 |
|
20 |
> > Rationale: 10.4 is the ultimate benchmark for self-containedness of |
21 |
> > prefix because loads of stuff the tools in the prefix need just don't |
22 |
> I'd be nice if you have the time to try, because I remember it took ages |
23 |
> to compile gcc-apple... :( |
24 |
|
25 |
Yep, it's quite the slowcoach. But it gets there eventually. :) |
26 |
-- |
27 |
tschoe, Michael |
28 |
weiser.dinsnail.net/ |