Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:44:14
Message-Id: 20090325134408.GM12431@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?) by Jeremy Olexa
On 25-03-2009 08:38:53 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote: > > <snip - I agree with the rest or don't have a comment> > > > In both cases, Prefix can adapt, but Prefix is not brought any closer to > > gentoo-x86 IMO by using either of both proposals, since gentoo-x86 > > doesn't follow it! > > With my original proposal here, we are very much closer to gentoo-x86 > because instead of adding another global scope variable (or changing > keywords), we just need to add prefix profiles - which we will anyway.
Yes, but if we kill prefix from EAPI, we will be there without any policy change. If we would also change all ED into $D$EPREFIX inheriting prefix.eclass would do the trick entirely and we could merge back. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?) Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o>