| 1 |
On 25-03-2009 08:38:53 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 2 |
> Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <snip - I agree with the rest or don't have a comment> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > In both cases, Prefix can adapt, but Prefix is not brought any closer to |
| 7 |
> > gentoo-x86 IMO by using either of both proposals, since gentoo-x86 |
| 8 |
> > doesn't follow it! |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> With my original proposal here, we are very much closer to gentoo-x86 |
| 11 |
> because instead of adding another global scope variable (or changing |
| 12 |
> keywords), we just need to add prefix profiles - which we will anyway. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Yes, but if we kill prefix from EAPI, we will be there without any |
| 15 |
policy change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If we would also change all ED into $D$EPREFIX inheriting prefix.eclass |
| 18 |
would do the trick entirely and we could merge back. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 23 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives