Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Markus Duft <mduft@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-alt] emake shell
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:46:32
Message-Id: 006a01c977e8$4eeb6ee0$ecc24ca0$@org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] emake shell by Fabian Groffen
> > On 16-01-2009 15:09:21 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: > > > > Please speak up, if you _don't_ want me to do this as a portage > patch > > > in the > > > > prefix tree. That's what I want to do, if nobody has a problem > with > > > it ;) > > > > > > Please don't. > > > > Ok, so what else then? > > Ignore my previous comment. Don't patch Portage. I see no problems in > applying it for every arch. So just get a patch on my desk so I can > commit it in Prefix Portage's sources. >
Ok, here we go :) Cheers, Markus
> > -- > Fabian Groffen > Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
portage-emake-shell.patch application/octet-stream

Replies

Subject Author
Re: RE: [gentoo-alt] emake shell Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>