Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:08:45
Message-Id: 20080519120843.GW18589@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh by Bacchella Fabrice
1 On 19-05-2008 14:06:41 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
2 >
3 > Le 19 mai 08 à 13:58, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
4 >
5 >> On 19-05-2008 13:55:12 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote:
6 >>> bin/bash and bin/rbash are here, but not bin/sh. Everything else is
7 >>> fine.
8 >>
9 >> ok, then I have to figure out why symlinking fails. Will fix the gcc
10 >> ebuilds later anyway.
11 >>
12 > I think the easiest and less brittle way is o create bin and sbin ? Is
13 > there a reason not to do that ?
14
15 From your initial email I undestood that we actually create that dir,
16 and that it breaks. ??? Just creating $EPREFIX/bin and $EPREFIX/sbin is
17 fine with me, and a very little effort if it just fixes this problem...
18
19
20 --
21 Fabian Groffen
22 Gentoo on a different level
23 --
24 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh Bacchella Fabrice <fabrice.bacchella@×××××××.com>