1 |
On 24-06-2008 08:09:35 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
2 |
> > |
3 |
> > Maurice Volaski wrote: |
4 |
> > > I fixed it by emerge-ing Gentoo's make. Seems there is a bug in the |
5 |
> > make |
6 |
> > > program in OpenSolaris. I guess I would amend the directions at |
7 |
> > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-solaris.xml |
8 |
> > to |
9 |
> > > emerge make before emerging flex. :-) |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > IMHO, I think make should be bootstrapped in code listing 1.3. On the |
12 |
> > 'spartan' OS's, I have seen problems with the native make (non-GNU) |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Haha... sometimes native make is simply not usable IMHO :) I |
15 |
> experienced some cool behaviours with some of them, like simply |
16 |
> stopping compilation in a directory without error and trying to |
17 |
> continue somewhere else - of course failing, because whole libs where |
18 |
> missing. Be thankfull that there was an error, that’s easier to find I |
19 |
> guess ;) |
20 |
|
21 |
Well, I guess all of you didn't notice that the bootstrap script |
22 |
creates a symlink to gmake, called "make" in the tmp directory. That is |
23 |
why setting up your path is important. |
24 |
|
25 |
> Also I thought gmake was a requirement for prefix...? or do I mess |
26 |
> this up with prefix-launcher? (this one needs it for sure... native |
27 |
> make cannot even parse the first 20 lines of the makefiles :)) |
28 |
|
29 |
Yes, therefore the bootstrap-prefix.sh script makes sure you're using |
30 |
gmake if the native make isn't sufficient. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Fabian Groffen |
35 |
Gentoo on a different level |
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |