Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] About unportable options
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:09:01
Message-Id: 20090211210852.GB22520@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] About unportable options by Serkan Kaba
On 11-02-2009 22:36:44 +0200, Serkan Kaba wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > While discussing about bug 235410, I asked Zac if repoman could check > for such unportable options and he said that could easily be done. So > I'm asking you -the prefix/alt devs- if you hit similar cases while > porting ebuilds. If so, can you extend the list of options to warn about.
In Prefix we have USERLAND=GNU, so that bug isn't relevant at all to us. However, we are affected by things like: append-lfdlags -Wl,--as-needed or: replace-flags -O* -O1 (iso -O? -O1) -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level