Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] broke prefix installation using "eselect profile"
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:13:16
Message-Id: 20110921181303.GG30957@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] broke prefix installation using "eselect profile" by Martin Luessi
1 Hi Martin,
2
3 On 21-09-2011 14:06:47 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote:
4 > I just successfully installed a gentoo prefix setup on CentOS (amd64).
5 > I was silly and used "eselect profile" after the instllation and this
6 > seems to have broken the instllation. I tried to fix it by having
7 > "$EPREFIX/etc/make.profile" point to
8 > "$EPREFIX/usr/portage/profiles/prefix/linux/amd64". However, now
9 > portage tries to install masked packages, e.g.,
10 >
11 > emerge -a portage
12 > ..
13 > [ebuild N *] sys-apps/sandbox-2.5 USE="(-multilib)"
14 > [ebuild U *] sys-apps/portage-9999 [2.2.01.19295] USE="-python2% -python3%"
15 >
16 > The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed:
17 > #required by sys-apps/portage-9999, required by portage (argument)
18 > >=sys-apps/sandbox-2.5 **
19 > #required by portage (argument)
20 > >=sys-apps/portage-9999 **
21 >
22 > On the other hand, if I set "EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--autounmask=n" all
23 > versions of portage seem to be masked. I have not manually unmasked or
24 > masked any packages and have no idea why this is happening. Any tips
25 > on how to fix this are greatly appreciated.
26
27 I think you messed with your SYNC variable. There is no portage-9999 in
28 the Prefix tree, so I think you synced up a gx86 tree.
29
30 Make sure portageq envvar SYNC returns a prefix mirror,
31 e.g. rsync://rsync.prefix.freens.org/gentoo-portage-prefix
32
33
34 --
35 Fabian Groffen
36 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] broke prefix installation using "eselect profile" Martin Luessi <mluessi@×××××.com>