Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix | ||
| Date: | Wed, 03 Aug 2011 05:49:37 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4E38E163.20605@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-alt] Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix by heroxbd@gmail.com | ||
| 1 | On 08/02/2011 06:36 PM, heroxbd@×××××.com wrote: |
| 2 | > BTW, the cycle of a bug request of keywording a certain ebuild is also |
| 3 | > too long. At present I maintain an overlay for myself for about 100 |
| 4 | > ebuilds only for adding an arch keyword to use in Prefix. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | This is totally unnecessary, since you can use |
| 7 | $EPREFIX/etc/portage/package.accept_keywords for these. Also, it's |
| 8 | common to use emerge's --autounmask-write option to populate this file |
| 9 | automatically. |
| 10 | -- |
| 11 | Thanks, |
| 12 | Zac |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-alt] Best Practice in Adopting New Ebuilds in Prefix | heroxbd@×××××.com |