| 1 |
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 16:01 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14-05-2009 15:09:24 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Hey There! |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > I'm having troubles with libintl.so.8 beeing non-executable recently... |
| 6 |
> > anybody else seeing this? i never noticed that before, and i'm sure i |
| 7 |
> > had that gettext version merged in all recent bootstraps. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > any ideas on who should make sure it _is_ executable? is it a bug in the |
| 10 |
> > gettext build system (yeah it is :)), and is it a bug in portage (i.e. |
| 11 |
> > should it make the .so executable?)? |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > i checked the ebuild - seems like nothing too suspicous going on. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Maybe this is something totally different, but doesn't the |
| 16 |
> eclass/portage somewhere *remove* the executable bit of shared |
| 17 |
> libraries? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
hmm. have to look that up, but i guess what you mean is the handling |
| 20 |
of .la files?. however it is strange because it is the _only_ .so that |
| 21 |
is not executable. and of course non-executable shared libraries don't |
| 22 |
work. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
i'd like to avoid a chmod a+x :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Cheers, Markus |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
Archives