From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree | ||
Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:03:50 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120121205522.GX71369@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-alt] Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree by Konstantin Tokarev |
1 | On 21-01-2012 23:44:18 +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: |
2 | > Advantage: much faster emerge --sync |
3 | |
4 | proof? |
5 | |
6 | > Possible migration path: |
7 | > 1) git init in master mirror of prefix portage tree |
8 | > 2) deliver files of initial .git repository via rsync |
9 | |
10 | the prefix neither the main tree aren't even in git, so it would only be |
11 | artificial bloat that keeps history with a non-existing/hard upgrade |
12 | path that's going to disappear as soon as we no longer need our overlay |
13 | |
14 | |
15 | -- |
16 | Fabian Groffen |
17 | Gentoo on a different level |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-alt] Proposal: use git instead of rsync for syncing of prefix portage tree | Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@××××××.ru> |