| 1 |
Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15-05-2008 12:05:23 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 3 |
>> For the ia64-linux I can see some future, as HP pushes the Itanium |
| 4 |
>> platform in general, running either HP-UX, Linux or Windows (and even |
| 5 |
>> OpenVMS). |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Although we do not run Linux on ia64 yet, because it is 64bit only |
| 8 |
>> (unlike hpux, linux does not support 32bit emulation on ia64 AFAICT), we |
| 9 |
>> eventually could switch one of our compile-farm nodes from ia64-hpux to |
| 10 |
>> ia64-linux - maybe the cross-compilers would run faster then... |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> But it's ok with me to drop ia64-linux ATM, and to re-add it when there |
| 13 |
>> is time to do so. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> It will be trivial to do so if that happens. I guess we'll eliminate |
| 16 |
> mips-linux and ia64-linux in one go for now then. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I have ia64-linux but not much use for it ATM. We are moving away from |
| 19 |
ia64-linux actually. So, tecnically, I *could* support it is any user |
| 20 |
wanted it but since no one has spoken yet..drop++. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-Jeremy |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives