From: | Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? | ||
Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:24:16 | ||
Message-Id: | 20110831212620.23a0d1e9@carl.erocal.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? by Fabian Groffen |
1 | On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:52:30 +0200 |
2 | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > On 31-08-2011 15:09:45 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
5 | > > > Aha. That explains. Now I understand why the fix fixes it as |
6 | > > > well. I'll apply it ASAP. Thanks a lot! |
7 | > > |
8 | > > A better fix might be to replace the + at the end of line 163 with |
9 | > > \. This way the parser concatenates the strings and we don't |
10 | > > introduce an extra operation. :) |
11 | > |
12 | > Since I'm a Python n00b, please tell me if |
13 | > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commitdiff;h=5551d449dffe531935dcd672f37c5cd3abd55a44;hp=3b74444f6684d7696e549cbdb76b8d1a0795fe2d |
14 | > is supposedly what you meant it to be. |
15 | |
16 | Exactly. Next time I'll provide a patch instead of trying to describe |
17 | it in words. :) |
18 | |
19 | |
20 | Burcin |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? | Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk> |