Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ?
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:24:16
Message-Id: 20110831212620.23a0d1e9@carl.erocal.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? by Fabian Groffen
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 20:52:30 +0200
Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:

> On 31-08-2011 15:09:45 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: > > > Aha. That explains. Now I understand why the fix fixes it as > > > well. I'll apply it ASAP. Thanks a lot! > > > > A better fix might be to replace the + at the end of line 163 with > > \. This way the parser concatenates the strings and we don't > > introduce an extra operation. :) > > Since I'm a Python n00b, please tell me if > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commitdiff;h=5551d449dffe531935dcd672f37c5cd3abd55a44;hp=3b74444f6684d7696e549cbdb76b8d1a0795fe2d > is supposedly what you meant it to be.
Exactly. Next time I'll provide a patch instead of trying to describe it in words. :) Burcin

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk>