From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 | ||
Date: | Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:43:18 | ||
Message-Id: | 20130127214324.GI83094@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 by Burcin Erocal |
1 | On 27-01-2013 22:23:26 +0100, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
2 | > Hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > the following traceback with prefix-portage.2.2.01.21580 was reported |
5 | > by Volker Braun here [1]: |
6 | |
7 | could this bug be related to this? |
8 | |
9 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/454060 |
10 | |
11 | > [1] https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lmnd-devel/TpP4sEhVFrw/discussion |
12 | > [2] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/lmnd-devel/TpP4sEhVFrw/iMnDZU9uTGsJ |
13 | |
14 | Bootstrapping is in an awkward state currently, because Portage itself |
15 | makes Python barf on some "write would block" error, cause a complete |
16 | meltdown. |
17 | |
18 | |
19 | -- |
20 | Fabian Groffen |
21 | Gentoo on a different level |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-alt] portage failure on fedora-18 | Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> |