From: | Steven Parkes <smparkes@××××××××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | RE: [gentoo-alt] id in coreutils7 | ||
Date: | Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:23:17 | ||
Message-Id: | 000b01c9b70e$a6d371b0$f47a5510$@net | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] id in coreutils7 by Jeremy Olexa |
1 | > Yea, there have been conflicting reports of coreutils status. For |
2 | > example, http://bugs.gentoo.org/264007 - but other people can't |
3 | > reproduce it. |
4 | |
5 | Hmmm not sure why people can't reproduce, unless it's a new bug in Darwin, because it's definitely a bug in Darwin. I added the details to the ticket. |
6 | |
7 | I don't know the approach to patching such things. Does prefix maintain patches for OS bug workarounds? I know there are patches. Including this kind of thing? |
8 | |
9 | There are a few possible ways to work around the bug. I put the details in the ticket. Happy to contribute the code ... |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-alt] id in coreutils7 | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-alt] id in coreutils7 | Aaron Wilson <tallest@×××××.com> |