1 |
On 09-10-2008 08:39:59 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
2 |
> Depends on the definition: |
3 |
> x86: "Gentoo Linux" |
4 |
> x86-linux: "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" |
5 |
> x86+linux: "Gentoo Prefix on any Linux" |
6 |
> |
7 |
> The *+* is only because there is non-Prefix *-fbsd already. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> And "Gentoo Linux" != "non-prefixed Gentoo on any Linux" != "Gentoo |
10 |
> Prefix on any Linux" |
11 |
> |
12 |
> The problem is how to distinguish |
13 |
> between "non-prefixed Gentoo on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd") |
14 |
> and "Gentoo Prefix on FreeBSD" (keyword "*-fbsd" in Prefix ATM) |
15 |
|
16 |
Not a problem, as in Prefix, it would be x86-freebsd, because people |
17 |
convinced me that fbsd is too short and causing inconsistencies, because |
18 |
nbsd or obsd would have multiple candidates. |
19 |
|
20 |
> > Yeah, and to me still an overloading of the keywording thing with Prefix |
21 |
> > stuff. PROPERTIES=prefix would be more to my liking. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Ok with me eventually to indicate prefix-awareness, but it does not fix |
24 |
> the *-fbsd (prefix <> non-prefix) problem, as they still would share the |
25 |
> same keyword. |
26 |
|
27 |
see above. |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-- |
31 |
Fabian Groffen |
32 |
Gentoo on a different level |