| 1 |
22.09.2011, 23:39, "Martin Luessi" <mluessi@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
> 2011/9/22 Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@××××××.ru>: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> š22.09.2011, 23:32, "Martin Luessi" <mluessi@×××××.com>: |
| 5 |
>>> šOn Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ricky Egeland <ricky.egeland@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> ššOn Sep 22, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Martin Luessi wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>>> ššHi, |
| 8 |
>>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>>> ššDid you ever figure out how to fix this? I have the same problem on |
| 10 |
>>>>> ššCentOS 5.6. I was able to install 4.5.2-r00.1 using the "vanilla" use |
| 11 |
>>>>> ššfalg, but it seems like this creates trouble later on (things being |
| 12 |
>>>>> ššlinked to system libraries instead the ones in prefix). |
| 13 |
>>>> ššNo, I never got it working. šI had to give up and move on. |
| 14 |
>>>> |
| 15 |
>>>> šš-- Ricky |
| 16 |
>>> šRicky, |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> šI am sorry to hear that. I belive the problem is that CentOS uses a |
| 19 |
>>> švery old glibc version (2.5), which isn't compatible with newer gcc |
| 20 |
>>> šversions. |
| 21 |
>> šHow can it be incompatible with gcc 4.4 if CentOS has 4.4.0 in repositories which |
| 22 |
>> šworks perfectly. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I don't know.. all I know is that my workstation at work uses CentOS |
| 25 |
> 5.6 with gcc 4.1.2 and glibc 2.5, which is consistent with |
| 26 |
> http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Maybe you should try RedHat branch of GCC (or just deceive portage and use binary |
| 29 |
4.4.0 from CentOS repositories to build prefix) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Regards, |
| 33 |
Konstantin |
Archives