1 |
On 27-01-2012 16:15:23 +0100, justin wrote: |
2 |
> On 27/01/12 15:10, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> > On 27-01-2012 14:32:59 +0100, justin wrote: |
4 |
> >> As far as I know there will be change for the ordinary usability of the |
5 |
> >> prefix tree. also for the dev setups I don't see a problem, because the |
6 |
> >> change allows the lower overlays to find its master, which shouldn't |
7 |
> >> effect the rsync-tree/prefix-overlay combination as such. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > do you overlay on the svn tree, or the prefix rsync tree? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> |
13 |
> the prefix rsync tree. |
14 |
|
15 |
ok, the prefix rsync tree has repo_name = gentoo_prefix |
16 |
|
17 |
the prefix svn tree has no repo_name |
18 |
|
19 |
(I have it locally, with repo_name set to gentoo) |
20 |
|
21 |
So you want an alias in the prefix rsync tree to "gentoo"? |
22 |
|
23 |
hmmm, I don't think that would hurt anyone, does it? |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Fabian Groffen |
29 |
Gentoo on a different level |