Archives
Archives
| From: | Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?) | ||
| Date: | Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:40:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | 49CA33ED.7080605@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?) by Fabian Groffen |
||
| 1 | Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | <snip - I agree with the rest or don't have a comment> |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > In both cases, Prefix can adapt, but Prefix is not brought any closer to |
| 6 | > gentoo-x86 IMO by using either of both proposals, since gentoo-x86 |
| 7 | > doesn't follow it! |
| 8 | |
| 9 | With my original proposal here, we are very much closer to gentoo-x86 |
| 10 | because instead of adding another global scope variable (or changing |
| 11 | keywords), we just need to add prefix profiles - which we will anyway. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -Jeremy |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-alt] [PREFIX] prefix keywords need to go (?) | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |