Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@×××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: cmake eclass fix
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:34:03
Message-Id: 4E8CDB4E.7080006@fairlite.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Re: cmake eclass fix by Jonathan Callen
On 10/05/11 22:39, Jonathan Callen wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 03:01 PM, Alan Hourihane wrote: > > On 10/04/11 11:24, Alan Hourihane wrote: > >> On 10/04/11 11:21, Alan Hourihane wrote: > >>> On 08/14/11 19:05, Alan Hourihane wrote: > >>>> On 08/14/11 11:40, Fabian Groffen wrote: > >>>>> On 07-07-2011 15:42:40 +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Can someone replace the link the cmake eclass that says > >>>>>> .... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> if use prefix; then > >>>>>> > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> > >>>>>> if use prefix && ! EPREFIX=; then > >>>>> Why is that necessary? Or is it MiNT that doesn't like the > >>>>> RPATH stuff? > >>>>> > >>>> Yes, it's the RPATH stuff that messes things up when > >>>> EPREFIX=/ > >>>> > >>> Any better fix for this ? > >>> > >>> Alan. > >> if use prefix && "${EPREFIX}" != ""; then > >> > >> The above is better. Can this be committed ? > >> > > > Actually this works for me..... > > > if use prefix && ! ${EPREFIX}; then > > > Alan. > > > I hope you meant: > > if use prefix && ! [[ ${EPREFIX} ]]; then >
I'd be fine with that :-) Alan.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: cmake eclass fix Michael Haubenwallner <haubi@g.o>