Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Re: RFC: changing sys-apps/portage python API to use $EROOT instead of $ROOT for keys to portage.db and similar map objects
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 20:14:32
Message-Id: 4EE26C1B.7060203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Re: RFC: changing sys-apps/portage python API to use $EROOT instead of $ROOT for keys to portage.db and similar map objects by Fabian Groffen
On 12/09/2011 11:22 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 09-12-2011 11:18:33 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: >>> Here's the commit to watch out for if/when it gets merged into the >>> prefix branch: >>> >>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=a715b65f7bd36409c1283e6911265d1f4405ab7a >> >> This change has hit in prefix portage-2.2.01.19833. The only problem >> that I've noticed so far is that `eselect news` doesn't find news items. >> I've attached a patch for eselect in order to fix this. The following >> commit will also have to be applied to prefix portage-2.2.01.19833 in >> order to make this work correctly: >> >> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=174ffd8336ec9914f85f871b7ce78506574d3d9b > > Thanks! Is there a bug against eselect for this? Prefix has no local > copy of eselect.
I've filed this bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=394187 -- Thanks, Zac