1 |
On 24-09-2011 08:58:00 -0400, Martin Luessi wrote: |
2 |
> >> If my time allows it, I'll look into it in five minutes, this is just a |
3 |
> >> message to everyone having this issue that there may be a light on the |
4 |
> >> horizon! ;) |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > try USE=vanilla, see if that works |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Be careful with that. I was able to install gcc 4.5 using -vanilla bit |
9 |
> then later on random packages would fail to compile. In particular I |
10 |
> had a problem with libxml2, which seemed to get linked to system |
11 |
> libraries instead of the ones in prefix. I'm not sure if this is |
12 |
> related, all I know is that the problem goes away when using gcc 4.2. |
13 |
|
14 |
You're absolutely right. It was meant as try to see if one of the |
15 |
patches affected the build. The produced GCC is unusable in Prefix |
16 |
indeed. |
17 |
|
18 |
> Also, have a look at the gcc ebuild the regular portage tree, gcc |
19 |
> 4.5.2 requires >=glibc.2.8, I assume there is a reason for that. |
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Fabian Groffen |
24 |
Gentoo on a different level |