| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:38 AM, <heroxbd@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey guys and gals, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I was hesitating to try gcc-4.5.3 on a CentOS 4.9 with stone aged |
| 5 |
> glibc-2.3 when I am bootstrapping it. In the past my experience with a |
| 6 |
> couple of old machines is that >=gcc-4.3 never emerge with <=glibc-2.5 |
| 7 |
> without USE vanilla. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> A thread discussed this too[1]. It was a failure of CentOS 5, which |
| 10 |
> makes CentOS 4 more scaring. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> To my surprise, gcc-4.5.3 USE 'fortran mudflap nls nptl openmp' worked! |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It isn't really a surprise to me. I've NEVER had gcc problems on RHEL4 |
| 15 |
(glibc-2.3.4 or so). But there are reports of problems with RHEL5. |
| 16 |
Gotta love linux, huh? =P |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Maybe we can make a prefix gcc / glibc version compatibility matrix to |
| 19 |
> track these reports :) |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Yours, |
| 22 |
> Benda |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.alt/6110/focus=6119 |
Archives