| 1 |
On 10-05-2011 17:31:25 -0300, Ricky Egeland wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On May 10, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >> gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-48) |
| 6 |
> >> $ ld -v |
| 7 |
> >> GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.6-14.el5 20061020 |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > It seems a bit too old, or too patched. Can you try installing newer |
| 10 |
> > gcc? 4.2 series must me sufficient, i think. If repositories for your |
| 11 |
> > distro doesn't have it, you can try installing it by hand, or emerge |
| 12 |
> > =gcc-4.2 && emerge binutils && emerge =gcc-4.2, but the latter |
| 13 |
> > probably won't work. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I managed to get the bootstrap procedure moving along by installing an older version of binutils. I'm continuing to build my prefix area with that change. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I think this should be ok. On purpose a new gcc is emerged early in the |
| 18 |
process. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> But I took a look, and CentOS 5.5 provides gcc 4.4.4 in its 'base' repository as the 'gcc44' package, so maybe that would have worked. If I get a chance later I can try the prefix bootstrap again and see if binutils compiles with that. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
On FreeBSD I also noticed that I needed this binutils 2.21-r1 version to |
| 23 |
get things going. I think you're wasting your time if you try again |
| 24 |
from scratch now. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 29 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives