| 1 |
Hello Perry, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
Please do not argue off-topics on the entire list. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Enabling HTML without Content-Type: multipart/alternative is |
| 6 |
non-standard http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML_e-mail |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Isn't it possible to set your MUA to send plain text as default? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Yours, |
| 11 |
Benda |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Perry Smith <pedzsan@×××××.com> writes: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> I can try. I need to hit shift-command-T before I sent the message |
| 16 |
> but there is nothing nagging me to do that. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> I must ask that isn't it time to change? I use to be on your side 12 |
| 19 |
> years ago but HTML in email has been with us for 15+ years now. It |
| 20 |
> just isn't that hard to either take the text only part of it or |
| 21 |
> sanitize the html. 15 years is a very long time to procrastinate |
| 22 |
> doing something that would help lots of people. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> The other choice which would help me is just reject the email. Then |
| 25 |
> it comes back to me, I can covert the message, and send it a 2nd time. |
| 26 |
> Its a small hassle but something that a few lists use to do. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Within the past five years, I find fewer and fewer lists that have |
| 29 |
> this restriction. I can't recall a list that has this restriction |
| 30 |
> except the gentoo list at this point. It is a somewhat negative |
| 31 |
> "sales" characteristic for gentoo to make this restriction. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
XU Benda |
| 35 |
Research Center for Neutrino Science |
| 36 |
Tohoku University |
| 37 |
JAPAN |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
http://www.awa.tohoku.ac.jp/~benda |
Archives