1 |
On 08-04-2009 15:13:53 +0000, Dirk Tilger wrote: |
2 |
> On 2009-04-07, Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > Is there anything that would break if we remove this symlink? And does |
4 |
> > it make sense to have both mesa and apple-opengl installed? I thought |
5 |
> > mesa provides an opengl implementation? I'm not to familiar with this |
6 |
> > stuff, so please tell me if I'm wrong. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> Hi Grobian, |
9 |
> |
10 |
> well, to be honest, I'm not deep into this either. "osmesa.h" declares |
11 |
> functions in /usr/X11R6/lib/libOSMesa.dylib, which is not currently |
12 |
> included in apple-opengl, so it wouldn't really change something if we |
13 |
> omitted it. Both header and library are not part of the OpenGL standard |
14 |
> and but provide additional functionality (offscreen rendering). |
15 |
|
16 |
Ok, have you tried if stuff works with modified apple-opengl not to |
17 |
provide osmesa.h? If so, I'm happy to remove the file from the ebuild. |
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Fabian Groffen |
22 |
Gentoo on a different level |