Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] AIX: libiconv issues still ?
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 10:51:05
Message-Id: 20070524105048.GI13326@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] AIX: libiconv issues still ? by Fabian Groffen
On 24-05-2007 12:39:34 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 24-05-2007 11:07:35 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-05-24 at 10:22 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > <snip> > > > If we change gen_usr_ldscript, the symlink will become relative, and the > > > whole patch above will become unnecessary. > > > > Argl, yes - (nightly) complex looking problems often have simple > > solutions (in the morning) :-) > > Ok, testing now, hopefully committing change to toolchain-utils.eclass soon.
Committed, appears to result in something working on Darwin. Didn't check the QA checks yet. Can someone on AIX sync and compile zlib to see what happens (with unpatched portage)? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level -- gentoo-alt@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] AIX: libiconv issues still ? Michael Haubenwallner <michael.haubenwallner@×××××××.at>