Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: heroxbd@g.o
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Is it OK to install baselayout/netifrc/openrc in Gentoo RAP?
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:22:21
Message-Id: 86bo1ykna1.fsf@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] Is it OK to install baselayout/netifrc/openrc in Gentoo RAP? by Yuchen Ying
1 Yuchen Ying <cnyegle@×××××.com> writes:
2
3 > Seems like the current RAP profile
4 > (heroxbd:default/linux/amd64/13.0/rap) enables some of the packages
5 > that wasn't available on normal Gentoo prefix
6 >
7 > [ebuild N #] sys-apps/baselayout-2.2 USE="-build" 0 kB
8 >
9 > [ebuild N #] sys-apps/openrc-0.12.4 USE="ncurses netifrc (prefix)
10 > unicode -debug -newnet (-pam) (-selinux) -static-libs -tools" 129 kB
11 >
12 > [ebuild N #] net-misc/netifrc-0.1 0 kBvu
13 >
14 > I masked these package for now but is it safe to install them?
15 >
16 > BTW, I think baselayout and baselayout-prefix should be conflict to
17 > each other.
18
19 Yes, it's safe.
20
21 You can choose between baselayout-prefix vs baselayout + openrc +
22 netifrc.