Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] GCC patches affecting mostly 64-bits targets
Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:43:40
Message-Id: 20080514104337.GA21745@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-alt] GCC patches affecting mostly 64-bits targets by Fabian Groffen
1 On 20-04-2008 16:29:58 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 ...
3 > It appears %D adds the multilib dirs (64-bits native compiler still
4 > considers itself to be multilib aware, because the host system is) when
5 > not ".", which causes the -L/usr/lib/64 and friends. I now patched GCC
6 > to think it's never in multilib for %D, such that we don't get the
7 > 64-bits paths. It seems to work fine on x64-solaris. I'm rebuilding my
8 > entire Prefix there, since all uploaded binaries are faulty, the same I
9 > will do on my sparc64-solaris prefix.
10 >
11 > I didn't revbump gcc, as not to force a recompile upon anyone. I think
12 > this patch resolves "hidden" problems on Linux as well.
13
14 I just found a problem on amd64-linux, where gnustep-gui wouldn't
15 compile as during linking the linker would complain about an
16 incompatible libbfd.a found in /usr/lib64/. Recompiling my GCC with the
17 above mentioned patch fixed this issue, so I'm confident that the patch
18 fixes some more "vague" problems we've seen in the past on Linux (e.g.
19 SuSE).
20
21
22 --
23 Fabian Groffen
24 Gentoo on a different level
25 --
26 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list