1 |
On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 09:29 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
2 |
> > I presume it means you added it and classed as untested. |
3 |
> > |
4 |
> > I've no idea what all the hunk failed was about though. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> "Hunk failed" is saying that some patch failed. You see that when |
7 |
> patches don't apply anymore. |
8 |
|
9 |
Sorry Jeremy, I realise that it's part of a patch that failed. What I |
10 |
failed to understand is why Fabian decided to cut & paste the import |
11 |
process and show that something failed patching did an edit on it and |
12 |
then further went on to commit it. |
13 |
|
14 |
It'd be much easier to understand if Fabian just said "o.k. done, but |
15 |
it's untested". |
16 |
|
17 |
> Sorry that it took so long for a dev to respond to your request but |
18 |
> this is precisely one of the reasons that I would prefer bug reports |
19 |
> on bugzilla rather than the ML. I forget to 'fix things' that are |
20 |
> presented on the ML and then they get buried and I won't be able to |
21 |
> easily tell what needs to happen. |
22 |
|
23 |
bugs can also get easily forgotten, and need pinging from time to time |
24 |
to get things moving. |
25 |
|
26 |
Alan. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list |