Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix] bootstrap on AIX with prefix-launcher:currently broken
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:08:34
Message-Id: 20080627130830.GP707@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] [prefix] bootstrap on AIX with prefix-launcher:currently broken by Greg
1 On 27-06-2008 08:00:29 -0500, Greg wrote:
2 > I touched make.conf and this is the result.
3 >
4 > using EPREFIX=/home/greg/gentoo
5 > *** doing stage: portage
6 > + PORTAGE_TMPDIR=/home/greg/gentoo/var/tmp
7 > + USE=build
8 > + FEATURES='-strict digest '
9 > ++ id -u
10 > + PORTAGE_INST_UID=101
11 > ++ id -un
12 > + PORTAGE_INST_USER=greg
13 > ++ id -g
14 > + PORTAGE_INST_GID=1
15 > ++ id -un
16 > + PORTAGE_USER=greg
17 > ++ id -gn
18 > + PORTAGE_GROUP=staff
19 > + emerge --oneshot --nodeps portage
20 > WARNING: repository at
21 > /usr/local/prefix-launcher-1.2/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/usr/portage is
22 > missing a repo_name entry
23 > emerge: superuser access is required.
24 >
25 > failed stage was: portage
26 >
27 >
28 > I thought one of the points of gentoo-prefix was to not need superuser.
29 > Also, it looks like it's pointing to the wrong location for the
30 > repository. (unless I did something wrong)
31
32 The message is misleading, but what it actually says is that it thinks
33 you are not the superuser (i.e. the one that installed portage). The
34 repository warning is fixed in later versions, but it feels like your
35 EPREFIX is not taken into account, unless your portage directory there
36 is a symlink.
37
38
39 --
40 Fabian Groffen
41 Gentoo on a different level
42 --
43 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies