List Archive: gentoo-alt
Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 15:41 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 13:48 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 10-01-2010 12:39:31 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 16:36 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > > On 09-01-2010 16:09:21 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > > > > > I also still need to put ...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > mysettings["EPREFIX"] = EPREFIX.rstrip(os.path.sep)
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, I added that back.
> > > >
> > > > I fixed the backtrace (hopefully) too. Can you try 2.2.00.15184?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I get this now when EPREFIX is ""
> > >
> > > File "/j/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/__init__.py", line 1178, in
> > > dolinkingstuff
> > > if "CHOST" in env and "CBUILD" in env and \
> > > TypeError: argument of type 'module' is not iterable
> > can you try the attached patch?
> That fixes that problem, but when I update net-misc/neon from 0.29.1 to
> 0.29.2 I'm getting this, but the files it's complaining about don't
> >>> Installing (1 of 1) net-misc/neon-0.29.2
> * This package will overwrite one or more files that may belong to
> * packages (see list below). You can use a command such as `portageq
> * owners / <filename>` to identify the installed package that owns a
> * file. If portageq reports that only one package owns a file then do
> * NOT file a bug report. A bug report is only useful if it identifies
> * least two or more packages that are known to install the same
> * If a collision occurs and you can not explain where the file came
> * then you should simply ignore the collision since there is not enough
> * information to determine if a real problem exists. Please do NOT file
> * a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org unless you report exactly
> * two packages install the same file(s). Once again, please do NOT file
> * a bug report unless you have completely understood the above message.
> * package net-misc/neon-0.29.2 NOT merged
> * Detected file collision(s):
> * /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/BUGS.bz2
> * /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/TODO.bz2
> * /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/AUTHORS.bz2
> * /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/NEWS.bz2
> * /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/README.bz2
> * /usr/share/doc/neon-0.29.2/THANKS.bz2
> * Searching all installed packages for file collisions...
> * Press Ctrl-C to Stop
> * None of the installed packages claim the file(s).
> * Package 'net-misc/neon-0.29.2' NOT merged due to file collisions. If
> * necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole content of the
> * above message.
Yikes, actually they do exist.
How did that happen. ??
Maybe part of the install process pushed them straight to / instead