| 1 |
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 10:56 AM, <mattmatteh@×××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2010, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> On 06-01-2010 07:22:34 -0800, velociraptor wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>> |
| 7 |
>>>> Hope that clears some waters. Really the best documentation is examples, |
| 8 |
>>>> there are 2500+ examples in the prefix tree. :) |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> Thanks for taking the time to respond Jeremy. I'll have a dig around |
| 11 |
>>> again in the ebuild writing section, look at the script and the |
| 12 |
>>> ebuilds themselves and come back with any specific questions I have. |
| 13 |
>>> I'll take a snapshot before I start mucking about so I can roll back |
| 14 |
>>> easily should get myself into a complete mess. |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Did you notice that netatalk is already in the normal Gentoo tree? |
| 17 |
>> http://packages.gentoo.org/package/net-fs/netatalk |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Yes, I did see that it's there. I'll build a Gentoo VM over the |
| 20 |
weekend to use as an example to take a stab at getting it running in |
| 21 |
my Solaris alt-prefix. I thought it best to start with a Netatalk |
| 22 |
ebuild, because know it works on Solaris. :-) I've been using |
| 23 |
Virtual Box for things I can't run under Solaris (like TwonkyMedia |
| 24 |
Server, a commercial product). There are a few other things I'm |
| 25 |
hoping I can get ebuilds going for so I can move them to native |
| 26 |
Solaris. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> looking at that ebuild, doesnt look too hard, but i think init scripts do |
| 29 |
> not work in prefix yet ? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I wouldn't be using Gentoo init scripts, I have xml manifest and a |
| 32 |
script I can modify to put it under Solaris' Service Management |
| 33 |
Facility. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Thanks for your input-- |
| 36 |
=Nadine= |
Archives