| 1 |
2011/9/22 Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@××××××.ru>: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> 22.09.2011, 23:32, "Martin Luessi" <mluessi@×××××.com>: |
| 5 |
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Ricky Egeland <ricky.egeland@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> On Sep 22, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Martin Luessi wrote: |
| 8 |
>>>> Hi, |
| 9 |
>>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> Did you ever figure out how to fix this? I have the same problem on |
| 11 |
>>>> CentOS 5.6. I was able to install 4.5.2-r00.1 using the "vanilla" use |
| 12 |
>>>> falg, but it seems like this creates trouble later on (things being |
| 13 |
>>>> linked to system libraries instead the ones in prefix). |
| 14 |
>>> No, I never got it working. I had to give up and move on. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>>> -- Ricky |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Ricky, |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
>> I am sorry to hear that. I belive the problem is that CentOS uses a |
| 21 |
>> very old glibc version (2.5), which isn't compatible with newer gcc |
| 22 |
>> versions. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> How can it be incompatible with gcc 4.4 if CentOS has 4.4.0 in repositories which |
| 25 |
> works perfectly. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I don't know.. all I know is that my workstation at work uses CentOS |
| 28 |
5.6 with gcc 4.1.2 and glibc 2.5, which is consistent with |
| 29 |
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=centos |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Best, |
| 32 |
Martin |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
> -- |
| 35 |
> Regards, |
| 36 |
> Konstantin |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
Archives