Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:24:18
Message-Id: 20080725092413.GF17546@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue? by Fabian Groffen
1 On 25-07-2008 11:18:55 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
2 > On 25-07-2008 11:09:00 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
3 > > File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1567, in __setitem__
4 > > _PackageMetadataWrapperBase.__setitem__(self, k, v)
5 > > File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/cache/mappings.py", line 182, in __setitem__
6 > > setattr(self, self._prefix + k, v)
7 > > AttributeError: '_PackageMetadataWrapper' object has no attribute '_val_EPREFIX'
8 >
9 > That's a Prefix error, thanks.
10
11 can you quickly try this patch?
12
13
14 --
15 Fabian Groffen
16 Gentoo on a different level

Attachments

File name MIME type
binp.patch text/plain

Replies