Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-alt
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-alt@g.o
From: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Subject: Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 11:24:13 +0200

 1.1

On 25-07-2008 11:18:55 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 25-07-2008 11:09:00 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
> >   File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/_emerge/__init__.py", line 1567, in __setitem__
> >     _PackageMetadataWrapperBase.__setitem__(self, k, v)
> >   File "/opt/gentoo.system/usr/lib/portage/pym/portage/cache/mappings.py", line 182, in __setitem__
> >     setattr(self, self._prefix + k, v)
> > AttributeError: '_PackageMetadataWrapper' object has no attribute '_val_EPREFIX'
> 
> That's a Prefix error, thanks.

can you quickly try this patch?


-- 
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level

 1.2

Index: pym/_emerge/__init__.py
===================================================================
--- pym/_emerge/__init__.py	(revision 11187)
+++ pym/_emerge/__init__.py	(working copy)
@@ -1443,7 +1443,7 @@
 	metadata_keys = [
 		"CHOST", "COUNTER", "DEPEND", "EAPI", "IUSE", "KEYWORDS",
 		"LICENSE", "PDEPEND", "PROVIDE", "RDEPEND",
-		"repository", "RESTRICT", "SLOT", "USE", "_mtime_"]
+		"repository", "RESTRICT", "SLOT", "USE", "_mtime_", "EPREFIX" ]
 
 	def __init__(self, **kwargs):
 		Task.__init__(self, **kwargs)
Replies:
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
References:
FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Fabian Groffen
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Markus Duft
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
-- Fabian Groffen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-alt: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Next by thread:
RE: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Previous by date:
Re: FW: portage badly broken - is this a prefix issue?
Next by date:
RE: portage bootstrap problem


Oct 11, 2008

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.