Archives
Archives
| From: | Markus Duft <mduft@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | RE: [gentoo-alt] emake shell | ||
| Date: | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:27:56 | ||
| Message-Id: | 006901c977e4$072bf560$1583e020$@org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] emake shell by Fabian Groffen |
||
| 1 | > |
| 2 | > On 16-01-2009 13:30:24 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 3 | > > > 3) should this be added in prefix, or in main? |
| 4 | > > |
| 5 | > > Please speak up, if you _don't_ want me to do this as a portage patch |
| 6 | > in the |
| 7 | > > prefix tree. That's what I want to do, if nobody has a problem with |
| 8 | > it ;) |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Please don't. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Ok, so what else then? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | > |
| 15 | > |
| 16 | > -- |
| 17 | > Fabian Groffen |
| 18 | > Gentoo on a different level |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-alt] emake shell | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-alt] emake shell | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> |