Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@×××××.org>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] Gentoo with mingw ?
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:58:13
Message-Id: 48805B22.6010302@cauwe.org
In Reply to: RE: [gentoo-alt] Gentoo with mingw ? by Markus Duft
1 Hello Markus,
2
3 This is a good idea porting Gentoo for Interix, which is very useful in
4 the enterprise world.
5
6 For home users, I would prefer more light (and thus less complete)
7 solutions.
8
9 Cygwin is quite like Interix : a UNIX environment in Windows.
10 The gentoo-cygwin project is dead and uncomplete.
11
12 mingwin (and its shell msys) is minimal, it has only a shell and base
13 packages in order to be able to compile (mingw-utils & w32api,
14 coreutils, binutils, gcc, autoconf, automake, libtool, gettext, ...).
15
16 The idea of mingwin is to have native applications without POSIX
17 dependency (just windows), and built in a minimal POSIX shell.
18
19 But it is a mess to find what package is the best to use, so I thought
20 to find a package manager for it. And when you need to compile a more
21 complex application, you need to find yourself the dependancies of the
22 packages, and how to build each of it.
23
24 My dream is to be able to start from msys and a minimal "Gentoo stage 1"
25 in order to bootstrap it and boost it with Gentoo ! And get working
26 Win32-mingw applications easily packageable.
27
28 If that project work, the numerous "how to compile ..." would be simple :
29 - install Gentoo-Mingw
30 - emerge --sync
31 - emerge my_soft (eventually using binary packages)
32 - run it !
33
34 Xavier
35
36
37 Markus Duft a écrit :
38 >> Hmm... I don't see any limitation at the download page:
39 >> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=93FF2201-325E-
40 >> 487F-A398-EFDE5758C47F&displaylang=en
41 >
42 > Yeah, it seems i was right, and SUA runs on any SP1 vista.
43 >
44 >> I will take a try some day, even I find installing 500Mb to run
45 >> GentooAlt is quite overkill, compared to msys/mingw.
46 >
47 > Interix was what we where using at our company, and so I started porting
48 > prefix to it. Wether this is the best or not was never the discussion
49 > (although I feel that interix behaves more predictable (not necessarily
50 > better) than cygwin. I had more trouble getting software to run on cygwin
51 > than on interix). I can't tell about msys, since I've never used it - but I
52 > think it's not a very complete environment, is it?
53 >
54 > Cheers, Markus
55 >
56 >> Xavier Miller a écrit :
57 >>> Hello,
58 >>>
59 >>> SUA is only available with "not home" versions of Vista, even with
60 >> SP1.
61 >>> Thus "Home" users are left on the side of the road. I think that if
62 >> we
63 >>> would have a more universal "Gentoo on Windows", we also should think
64 >>> about mingwin+msys or cygwin.
65 >>>
66 >>> So I will take a look at the Interix port and see how difficult it
67 >> would
68 >>> be to adapt it to mingw.
69 >>>
70 >>> Xavier.
71 >>>
72 >>> Markus Duft a écrit :
73 >>>>> Hello,
74 >>>>>
75 >>>>> Is there a projet to run Gentoo / Gentoo Prefix with mingw (+
76 >> msys)?
77 >>>>> I took a look at Interix but it doensn't run with Windows Vista
78 >> Home
79 >>>> I thought this was solved with vista SP1? Am I wrong here?
80 >>>>
81 >>>>> and
82 >>>>> I would like a more "free" system, like Cygwin or Mingw.
83 >>>>>
84 >>>>> What would be the better approach : starting from old cygwin-
85 >> portage or
86 >>>>> gentoo-prefix@interix?
87 >>>> I think the interix version ist he more current one, although mingw
88 >>>> will be
89 >>>> much different I guess. Still the interix port is the best starting
90 >> point
91 >>>> you will ever get for this, I guess...
92 >>>>
93 >>>> Cheers, Markus
94 >>>>
95 >>>>> Kind regards,
96 >>>>> Xavier Miller
97 >>>>> --
98 >>>>> gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list
99 >>>>
100 >> --
101 >> gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list
102 >
103 >
104 --
105 gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list