| 1 |
Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> I think you look for a business model, and yes we don't have one. We're |
| 3 |
> open source. We're .org. We're just for fun. |
| 4 |
Yes /we/ have a business model, but I still do this for /fun/ and have |
| 5 |
just too lazy to move over to my new project centric email. |
| 6 |
codestr0m@××××××.org |
| 7 |
> I'm sure there is a need |
| 8 |
> for what you do, which is proven by your user-base, but it's from a |
| 9 |
> totally different angle than ours. In my opinion, you and I can't |
| 10 |
> competitors at all. On the contrary, we can help each other with |
| 11 |
> patches for applications we both want to use. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
There's various ways to get commit notification for our project including.. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
rss and atom feeds |
| 16 |
http://hg.osunix.org/osunix-overlay/ |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
osunix-commits |
| 19 |
http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/osunix-commits |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
For gentoo-alt needs you'd maybe be interested in osunix-commits and |
| 22 |
filter for anything that's tagged osunix-overlay. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Other sources of patches for solaris are sfw, sfe, blastwave, belenix, |
| 25 |
jds, kde4-specs-dev and maybe a few more, but these are more or less |
| 26 |
what I follow. If there's a clean way monitor any gentoo-alt patches |
| 27 |
that are solaris related I'd be happy to review and coordinate if I see |
| 28 |
overlap. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Cheers, |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
./C |
Archives