Archives
Archives
| From: | Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-alt@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? | ||
| Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:52:55 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20110831185230.GP42206@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? by Burcin Erocal |
||
| 1 | On 31-08-2011 15:09:45 +0200, Burcin Erocal wrote: |
| 2 | > > Aha. That explains. Now I understand why the fix fixes it as well. |
| 3 | > > I'll apply it ASAP. Thanks a lot! |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > A better fix might be to replace the + at the end of line 163 with \. |
| 6 | > This way the parser concatenates the strings and we don't introduce an |
| 7 | > extra operation. :) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Since I'm a Python n00b, please tell me if |
| 10 | http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commitdiff;h=5551d449dffe531935dcd672f37c5cd3abd55a44;hp=3b74444f6684d7696e549cbdb76b8d1a0795fe2d |
| 11 | is supposedly what you meant it to be. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Thanks! |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Fabian Groffen |
| 18 | Gentoo on a different level |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-alt] portage bug ? | Burcin Erocal <burcin@××××××.org> |